Archive for the 'Pro' Category

Why SCRs are a long-term plan for long-term conditions

Posted at Monday, October 31st, 2011 by andrew

Dick Vinegar writes on the Guardian web site:
Who would have thought it, the Department of Health is encouraging NHS organisations “to accelerate creation of summary care records (SCRs), with the aim of having them in place for most patients by 2013-14″. And 9m records have already been uploaded. This is a miracle.
At the general election [...]

A charitable interpretation of electronic health records

Posted at Monday, September 26th, 2011 by andrew

Dick Vinegar writes in his “Pateient from Hell” blog at the Guardian:
I sometimes feel I am on my own in arguing that the Summary Care Record, handled properly, would increase my own safety and that of most other patients. I see myself as a gallant little fighter against the serried ranks of clinical SCR-naysayers, security [...]

Why, oh why? The week the pundits ran riot

Posted at Friday, August 12th, 2011 by andrew

Tom Peck, writing in the Independent, has collated 29 comments from various pundits about this week’s riots & looting. He reports that David Aaronovitch wrote in The Times:
A certain kind of right-winger fits the riots into the pattern of moral and social decline that she imagines has afflicted British society since the 1950s … Vicars [...]

U-turn again

Posted at Friday, June 24th, 2011 by andrew

Helen Gibson writes in Progress magazine:
One of the first coalition policies to be announced in 2010 was a plan to grant anonymity to men accused of committing rape. This had not been a policy in either the Tory of Liberal Democrat manifesto, and yet appeared to be cooked up by the cabal of eight white [...]

Without a DNA database these monsters could still be on the streets

Posted at Monday, January 17th, 2011 by andrew

Martin Philips writes in The Sun:
Thousands of DNA profiles could soon be erased from the police database – despite officers using it to solve countless serious crimes.
A judgement by the European Court of Human Rights ruled that it was illegal for the Government to keep the DNA details of those arrested – but not convicted [...]

Search provided by Google