<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' ?>			<rss version="2.0">
				<channel>
					<title>NO2ID Press Release RSS</title>
					<link>http://www.no2id.net/</link>
					<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:34:25 +0100</pubDate>
					<description>The Latest Press Releases from NO2ID - the UK Campagin against ID Cards and the Database State</description>
					<item><title>Deceptive rebranding covers more ID cost increases</title>
	<link>http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=Deceptive_rebranding</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
	<description><![CDATA[
		    
		    <p>The latest ten-year cost estimate of the National Identity Scheme [1] –
which specifically excludes costs to business, citizens and any part of government other than the Home Office – shows a &pound;160 million increase in
6 months. It is a forward-looking estimate only and completely ignores
the &pound;250 million+ already spent on the scheme [2].
<br />
<br />In the face of sustained opposition from airline unions to ID pilot
schemes [3], IPS Chief Executive James Hall tried re-branding ID cards
as a 'service' at a 'low-key, pre-breakfast briefing' in Manchester Central Library [4] in an attempt to encourage residents of the city to
sign up early.
<br />
<br />Phil Booth, National Coordinator of NO2ID said:<em></em></p><blockquote><em>'Five years in, the admitted Home Office costs are over &pound;5 billion – and
they're suspiciously silent on fees. Anyone who registers now has been
conned into signing away their privacy for life AND giving the
government a blank cheque.'
</em></blockquote><p>
Guy Herbert, NO2ID General Secretary, said:<br />
</p><blockquote><em>'Calling ID cards a 'service' is shameless propaganda. There's no other
way to try to suggest the ID scheme is either useful or wanted. No one
outside Whitehall and its favourite IT firms is going to benefit. But
they want us to love Big Brother.'
</em></blockquote><p>
-ENDS-
<br />
<br />Notes for editors:
<br />
<br />1) The latest Cost Report should be available from
<br /><a href="http://www.ips.gov.uk/identity/publications-legislative.asp" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://www.ips.gov.uk/identity/publications-legislative.asp</a>
<br />
<br />2) Costs prior to 2008 are on record, but a Parliamentary Answer on 21
April 2009 reveals IPS spent &pound;31,923,000 on ID-related consultants in
<br />2008 alone – almost &pound;125,000 PER DAY:
<br /><a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm090421/text/90421w0016.htm" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm090421/text/90421w0016.htm</a>
<br />
<br />3) 'Pilots to boycott ID trial', Manchester Evening News, 5 May 2009:
<br /><a href="http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1113566_pilots_to_boycott_id_trial" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/1113566_pilots_to_boycott_id_trial</a>
<br />
<br />4) 'Jacqui Smith says ID cards could be available from high street
shops', Times, 6 May 2009:
<br /><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6229354.ece" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6229354.ece</a>
<br />
<br />5) NO2ID is the UK-wide non-partisan campaign against ID cards and the database state. See <a href="../dbstate.php" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://www.no2id.net/dbstate.php</a> for a list of
<br />'database state' initiatives that NO2ID is actively opposing, and
<a href="../datasharing" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://www.no2id.net/datasharing</a> for how it all fits together.
<br />
<br />
For further information, or for immediate or future interview, please
contact:
<br />
<br />Phil Booth (National Co-ordinator, <a href="mailto:national.coordinator@no2id.net" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated">national.coordinator@no2id.net</a>) on 07974 230 839
<br />Guy Herbert (General Secretary, <a href="mailto:general.secretary@no2id.net" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated">general.secretary@no2id.net</a>) on 07956
544 308
<br />Michael Parker (Press Officer, <a href="mailto:press.officer@no2id.net" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated">press.officer@no2id.net</a>) on 07773 376 166

		    		    &nbsp;</p>		    		    ]]></description>
	<guid>http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=Deceptive_rebranding</guid>
</item>

<item><title>Blunkett's comments on ID cards are baffling</title>
	<link>http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=Blunkett_baffling</link>
	<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
	<description><![CDATA[David Blunkett's latest comments on the National Identity Scheme are at best absurd. The circular logic deployed by the former Home Secretary borders on mendacious.<br /><br />In words described as 'a major shift' (Evening Standard) and a 'significant U-turn' (Guardian), Blunkett called at a trade conference yesterday for the ID card and National Identity Scheme to be scrapped in favour of introducing compulsory biometric passports for all. (1) But the descriptions are wrong.<br /><br />To be clear: Blunkett, the godfather of the National Identity Scheme in its original form in 2003, is suggesting scrapping a nominally 'optional' (2) biometric-based, database-backed ID card, that you would be compelled to register for on applying for a passport, and replacing it with a compulsory, biometric-based, database-backed passport. (3)<br /><br />He then added: 'Most people already have a passport but they might want something more convenient to carry around than the current passport and may be able to have it as a piece of plastic for an extra cost.'<br /><br />The former minister suggests something smaller and more 'convenient' – a wallet-friendly card perhaps? (4)<br /><br />NO2ID (5) spokesman Michael Parker said:<br /><blockquote><em>'Since he left the cabinet, Mr Blunkett’s comments on the identity scheme have been variously confused, reckless and wrong.<br /><br />'His latest addition is to advocate replacing one scheme with another that is almost identical – all under the guise of a U-turn. This is deranged.<br /><br />'It doesn’t matter what shape it is or what they call it – you will still be interrogated for your personal details; they will still take your fingerprints; and there will still be a database through which the Home Office will track you throughout your life.'</em></blockquote>Blunkett's approach to 'abandoning ID cards' is remarkably similar to the smoke and mirrors approach taken by the Home Office itself earlier this week when announced that the Interception Modernisation Programme in the form of a 'super-database' of all communications traffic would be 'dropped'... Yet, the substance of the scheme – to intercept and store all the details of to every citizen’s every communication for official use would be kept intact - just the practical problems of storage and management delegates to Internet Service Providers themselves.<br /><br />ENDS<br /><br />NOTES<br /><br />(1)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; See <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8022791.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8022791.stm</a><br />(2)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Identity Cards Act 2006 allows the Home Secretary to 'designate' documents that would require registration on the National Identity Register database before they can be issued – for example, passport, CRB certificate, or driving licence, without which you would 'voluntarily' be choosing not to travel, work or drive.<br />(3)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The upgrade of passports under Royal prerogative without debate in 2005 has been used since then as a pretext to build sytems that are intended to be part of the wider National Identity Scheme. With the objective of merging the two the UK Passports Agency has been absorbed into a rapidly expanding Identity and Passport Service.<br />(4)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The current proposal for the ID scheme is that an ID card would either be purchased with a passport as a package, or might be obtained separately for a &pound;30 registration fee. Once a citizen’s personal details have been registered on the database, part of the application process, the legislation says an identity card *must* be issued itself, and the citizen would be obliged to keep all details updated for life.<br />(5)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; NO2ID has been since 2004 the national non-partisan campaign against ID cards and the database state. See <a href="http://www.no2id.net/dbstate.php">http://www.no2id.net/dbstate.php</a> for a list of 'database state' initiatives that NO2ID is actively opposing, and <a href="http://www.no2id.net/datasharing">http://www.no2id.net/datasharing</a> for how it all fits together.<br /><br />For further information, or for immediate or future interview, please contact:<br />Phil Booth (National Co-ordinator, <a href="mailto:national.coordinator@no2id.net">national.coordinator@no2id.net</a>) on 07974 230 839<br />Guy Herbert (General Secretary, <a href="mailto:general.secretary@no2id.net">general.secretary@no2id.net</a>) on 07956 544 308<br />Michael Parker (Press Officer, <a href="mailto:press.officer@no2id.net">press.officer@no2id.net</a>) on 07773 376 166<br />
		    		    ]]></description>
	<guid>http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=Blunkett_baffling</guid>
</item>

<item><title>Jacqui Smith announces UK to have most intrusive surveillance powers anywhere</title>
	<link>http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=Smith_announces</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>
		    The Home Secretary today makes a delayed announcement of a consultation on proposals for the so-called Intercept Modernisation Programme. It has been widely reported for some months, and plans were acknowledged by Lord West the security minister last week[1], that this would place Home Office 'probes' in the datacentres of every British internet provider at an estimated cost of &pound;12 billion.<br /><br />This would allow direct skimming of all traffic, making it massively easier to intercept email and monitor individual's web use using existing powers. The Home Office would become a clearing-house, able to provide data ad lib to other government agencies. It would also become possible for the first time to collect and store details of <strong>all</strong> communications by everyone in the country so that government agencies could investigate friendship networks and personal habits using data-mining techniques [2].<br /><br />Guy Herbert, General Secretary of NO2ID [3] said:<br /><br /><em>'Just a week after the Home Secretary announced a public consultation on </em><em>some trivial trimming of local authority surveillance, we have this: a </em><em>proposal for powers more intrusive than any police state in history.</em><br /><br /><em>'Ministers are making a distinction between content and communications </em><em>data into sound-bite of the year. But it is spurious. Officials from </em><em>dozens of departments and quangos could know what you read online, and </em><em>who all your friends are, who you emailed, when, and where you were when </em><em>you did so - all without a warrant[4]. Tracking your your every move is </em><em>more efficiently creepy than reading your letters.'</em><br /><br />-ENDS-<br /><br />Notes for editors:<br /><br />1) See, for example: The Register 'Spy chiefs size up net snoop gear'<br /><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/21/imp_dpi/">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/21/imp_dpi/</a><br /></p><p>2) As suggested by Sir David Omand in his 'A discussion paper for the ippr Commission on National Security for the 21st Century'</p><p> 'Finding out other people's secrets is going to involve breaking everyday moral rules.' - But the Home Office's use of such a super-database is *not* limited to intelligence work - see note 4.<br /><br />3) NO2ID is a national, non-partisan campaign against ID cards and the database state. See <a href="http://www.no2id.net/dbstate.php">http://www.no2id.net/dbstate.php</a> for a list of other 'database state' initiatives that NO2ID is actively opposing, and <a href="http://www.no2id.net/datasharing">http://www.no2id.net/datasharing</a> for how they fit together.<br /><br />4) Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, the Home Secretary's - not a court's - warrant is required to read mail or listen to phone calls. But all the following may authorise themselves to examine communications data for their own purposes:<br /><br />43 police forces in England &amp; Wales<br />8 police forces in Scotland<br />Police Service of Northern Ireland<br />British Transport Police<br />Port of Liverpool Police<br />Port of Dover Police<br />Royal Military Police<br />Royal Air Force Police<br />Civil Nuclear Constabulary<br />Ministry of Defence Police<br />Royal Navy Police<br />Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs<br />Serious Organised Crime Agency<br />Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency<br />United Kingdom Border Agency.<br />The Prison Service<br /><br />Approximately 474 local authorities throughout the UK.<br /><br />Approximately 110 *other* public authorities, including<br />almost all government departments, and<br />Serious Fraud Office<br />Independent Police Complaints Commission<br />Charity Commission<br />Gambling Commission<br />Royal Mail<br />to name only a few.<br /><br />(source: report of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner<br /><a href="http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc0708/hc09/0947/0947.pdf">http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc0708/hc09/0947/0947.pdf</a> )<br /><br />For further information, or for immediate or future interview, please<br />contact:<br /><br />Phil Booth (National Co-ordinator, <a href="mailto:national.coordinator@no2id.net">national.coordinator@no2id.net</a>) on 07974 230 839<br />Guy Herbert (General Secretary, <a href="mailto:general.secretary@no2id.net">general.secretary@no2id.net</a>) on 07956 544 308<br />Michael Parker (Press Officer, <a href="mailto:press.officer@no2id.net">press.officer@no2id.net</a>) on 07773 376 166<br /><br />
		    		    		    </p><p></p>]]></description>
	<guid>http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=Smith_announces</guid>
</item>

<item><title>Home Office dodges the issue on snooping powers</title>
	<link>http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=HO_dodges_issue</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
	<description><![CDATA[
		    
		    Of over half a million uses of surveillance powers by officials each year only about 12,000 (or 1 in 400) are by a local authorities [1]. Yet the review of the powers under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 announced by the Home Office today [2] chooses to emphasise the tiny minority of cases where local authorities (rather than the police, government departments or quangos), are involved in what is called in the jargon 'intrusive surveillance'. It proposes a new official code of practice will deal with recently publicised abuses. <br /><br />The monitoring of private telephone and internet communications, which the Home Office is currently working massively to expand, is not counted as 'intrusive surveillance'. The collection of information about travellers' movements through e-Borders scheme or of car journeys using automatic numberplate recognition by traffic cameras, is not within the official definition of 'surveillance' at all.<br /><br />Guy Herbert, NO2ID's [3] General Secretary, said:<br /><br /><blockquote>'<em>This is yet another sickening con-trick from an incurably mendacious department. The Home Office is taking advantage of the publicity surrounding a handful of special cases out of millions, to pretend to be limiting the surveillance culture that in fact it is rapidly expanding. <br /><br />'Who decides when watching you, bugging you, checking who you telephone, and overseeing what you read online are justified? The bureaucrat’s answer is — the same organisations doing the snooping. We don’t need more codes of practice, a different set of boxes to be ticked. We need independent assessment of every surveillance request by a magistrate or judge, who can look at the facts, not just the procedure.'</em></blockquote>-ENDS-<br /><br />Notes for editors:<br /><br />1)&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Source: Annual reports of the Chief Surveillance Commissioner<br /><a href="http://www.surveillancecommissioners.gov.uk/docs1/osc_annual_rpt_2007_08.pdf">http://www.surveillancecommissioners.gov.uk/docs1/osc_annual_rpt_2007_08.pdf</a><br />&nbsp;and the Interception of Communications Commissioner<br />&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<a href="http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc0708/hc09/0947/0947.pdf">http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/hc0708/hc09/0947/0947.pdf</a><br /><br />2)&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Home Office press release<br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://nds.coi.gov.uk/content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=398807&amp;NewsAreaID=2">http://nds.coi.gov.uk/content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=398807&amp;NewsAreaID=2</a><br /><br />3) NO2ID is the UK-wide non-partisan campaign against ID cards and the database state. See http://www.no2id.net/dbstate.php for a list of 'database state' initiatives that NO2ID is actively opposing, and http://www.no2id.net/datasharing for how it all fits together.<br /><br />For further information, or for immediate or future interview, please contact<br />Guy Herbert (General Secretary, <a href="mailto:general.secretary@no2id.net">general.secretary@no2id.net</a>) on 07956 544 308<br />Mark Littlewood (Chair, <a href="mailto:chair@no2id.net">chair@no2id.net</a>) on 07974 692 299, or<br />Michael Parker (Press Officer, <a href="mailto:press.officer@no2id.net">press.officer@no2id.net</a>) on 07773 376 166.
		    		    		    		    ]]></description>
	<guid>http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=HO_dodges_issue</guid>
</item>

<item><title>Wasteful empire-building of ID agency</title>
	<link>http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=Wasteful_empire-building</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Just after Parliament has gone on Easter recess, the Identity and Passport Service (IPS) has chosen to announce over half a billion pounds worth of contracts for its controversial National Identity Scheme.</p>
<p>CSC has been awarded &pound;385 million to &quot;upgrade IPS' application and enrolment system&quot; – which will register applicants for both ID cards and passports – and IBM has been awarded &pound;265 million to &quot;build and run the [biometric] database&quot;, which is ultimately intended to hold the fingerprints and facial images of every UK resident over the age of 16.</p>
<p>The pretext is that most expenditure would have to be incurred by changes being made to passports anyway, though UK passports have only recently been changed to meet the standard agreed by the 148 countries in the International Civil Aviation Organisation. The costs claimed for these changes have already hiked the price of a passport from &pound;42 in late 2005 to &pound;72 now [1].</p>
<p>Combined with biographical data held in the DWP's 'Customer Information System' (CIS), the contracts mark the first steps towards the 'National Identity Register' – the set of linked databases at the heart of the ID system. A previous &pound;18 million contract for a temporary ID database was awarded to Thales UK in August 2008, so that the Home Office could meet politically-imposed deadlines for roll-out and avoid embarrassing ministers. Now the contracts are openly being restructured to suit longer-term goals.</p>
<p>Phil Booth, National Coordinator of NO2ID [2] said:</p>
<p><em>'Despite knowing that the ID scheme will be scrapped under any change of government, the Home Office is ploughing ahead with its gold-plated white elephant.</em></p>
<p><em>
'The new style contracts are calculated to obscure exactly what is going on, but the IPS appears to thinks it can lock future governments into its empire-building plans by throwing away the perfectly good passport systems we have.'</em></p>

<p>-ENDS-</p>
<p>Notes for editors:</p>

<p>1) As far back as 2003, &quot;more than half&quot; of the price rise for a standard adult passport from &pound;33 to &pound;42 was claimed to be for &quot;the inclusion in passports of information identifying their owners - microchips containing fingerprints, for example, or pictures of their iris or other facial characteristics&quot; – see <a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3078483.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/<wbr />3078483.stm</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Further rises – to &pound;51 in December 2005, &pound;66 in October 2006 and &pound;72 in October 2007 – were all justified with similar claims, but this latest announcement implies that the first (hugely costly) generation of ePassports are now to be scrapped.&nbsp;</p>
<p>2) NO2ID is the UK-wide non-partisan campaign against ID cards and the database state. See <a target="_blank" href="../dbstate.php">http://www.no2id.net/dbstate.<wbr />php</a> for a list of 'database state' initiatives that NO2ID is actively opposing, and <a target="_blank" href="../datasharing">http://www.no2id.net/<wbr />datasharing</a> for how it all fits together.</p>


<p>For further information, or for immediate or future interview, please contact:</p><p><font color="#888888"><font color="#000000">Phil Booth (National Co-ordinator, <a href="mailto:national.coordinator@no2id.net">national.coordinator@no2id.net</a></font><wbr /><font color="#000000">) on 07974 230 839</font>&nbsp;</font></p><p><font color="#000000">
Guy Herbert (General Secretary, <a href="mailto:general.secretary@no2id.net">general.secretary@no2id.net</a>) on 07956 544 308</font></p><p><font color="#000000">
Michael Parker (Press Officer, <a href="mailto:press.officer@no2id.net">press.officer@no2id.net</a>) on 07773 376 166</font>&nbsp;</p>
		    		    ]]></description>
	<guid>http://www.no2id.net/news/pressRelease/release.php?name=Wasteful_empire-building</guid>
</item>

				</channel>
			</rss>
		